ד נִקְרַע הַטַּלִּית תּוֹךְ ג' אֶצְבָּעוֹת סָמוּךְ לִשְׂפַת הַכָּנָף, אֵינוֹ רַשַּׁאי לְתָפְרוֹ, וּפֵרֵשׁ רַשִׁ"י דְּחַיְישִׁינָן שֶׁיִּשְׁתַּיֵּר מֵחוּט הַתְּפִירָה וְיַנִּיחֶנּוּ וְיוֹסִיף עָלָיו שִׁבְעָה חוּטִין לְשֵׁם צִיצִית, וּלְטַעַם זֶה אֲפִלּוּ נִקְרַע כָּל שֶׁהוּא לֹא יִתְפֹּר. וּלְפִי זֶה טַלִּית שֶׁל צֶמֶר שֶׁנִּקְרְעָה תּוֹךְ שְׁלֹשָׁה מֻתָּר לִתְפֹּר הָאִדָּנָא דְּאֵין דֶּרֶךְ לִתְפֹּר בִּחוּטֵי צֶמֶר, וְרַב עַמְרָם פֵּרֵשׁ דְּטַעֲמָא מִשּׁוּם דְּנִקְרַע תּוֹךְ שְׁלֹשָׁה לֵית בֵּיהּ תּוֹרַת בֶּגֶד, וּכְמָאן דְּלֵיתֵיהּ דְּמֵי וְאַף עַל גַּב דְּתַפְרֵיהּ כְּמָאן דְּפָסִיק חָשׁוּב וְאִי עָבִיד בֵּיהּ צִיצִית לֹא פְּטָרָהּ לַטַּלִּית, וּלְפֵרוּשׁ זֶה אִם נִקְרַע וְנִשְׁתַּיֵּר כָּל שֶׁהוּא כָּשֵׁר, וְיֵשׁ אוֹמְרִים דִּלְרַב עַמְרָם לֹא נִפְסַל אֶלָּא צִיצִית שֶׁהָיוּ בּוֹ בְּעֵת שֶׁתְּפָרוֹ, אֲבָל אִם אַחַר שֶׁתְּפָרוֹ הֵטִיל בּוֹ צִיצִית כָּשֵׁר, וִירֵא שָׁמַיִם יֵצֵא אֶת כֻּלָּם הֵיכָא דְּאֶפְשָׁר.
4 If the טלית tore within 3 fingerbreadths near the edge of the corner, one is not permitted to sew it back up. And the explanation of Rashi is that we're worried that there will be left over from the sewing thread, and he will leave it there [hanging off of the corner] and he will add on to it 7 more strings for the sake of ציצית. And according to this reasoning, even if [the corner] was torn any amount, one may not sew it up. And according to this, a wool טלית that tore within 3 [fingerbreadths] - it is permitted to sew it up nowadays, since it's not the normal way to sew with wool thread. And Rav Amram explains that the reason [one may not sew up the טלית] is because when it tears within 3 [fingerbreadths], it (the torn corner) is not considered a garment, and it's like it's not there, and even if he sewed it back on, it is considered like it's detached, and if one were to make ציצית for it, it would not exempt the טלית [from needing ציצית]. And according to this explanation, if it tore and there remained any part at all [attached to the טלית], it is valid. And there are those that say that according to Rav Amram, only ציצית that were on it at the time that he sewed it back on are invalid; but if after he sewed it, he placed ציצית on it, it is valid. And a G-d fearing person complies with all of [the opinions] where it's possible.