כה כָּל אוֹת שֶׁהִיא כְּתוּבָה שֶׁלֹּא כְּתִקְנָהּ וְאֵין צוּרָתָהּ עָלֶיהָ, כְּגוֹן נָגַע רֶגֶל הָאָלֶ"ף בְּגַג הָאָלֶ"ף אוֹ פְּנֵי הָאָלֶ"ף בִּפְנִים בַּגַּג שֶׁתַּחְתֶּיהָ, אוֹ שֶׁהָיָה רֶגֶל הַהֵ"א, אוֹ רֶגֶל הַקּוֹ"ף נוֹגְעִים אוֹ שֶׁהָיְתָה אוֹת אַחַת חֲלוּקָהּ לִשְׁתֵּי אוֹתִיּוֹת, כְּגוֹן צַדִּ"י שֶׁכָּתַב יוֹ"ד נוּ"ן אוֹ שִׁי"ן, שֶׁכָּתַב עַיִ"ן יוֹ"ד אוֹ חֵ"ית, שְׁנֵי זַיְנִי"ן וְאַחַר שֶׁכָּתַב לְפָנָיו חָזַר וְתִקְּנָם, הָוֵי שֶׁלֹּא כְּסִדְרָן וּפְסוּלִין. אֲבָל לְהַפְרִיד הָאוֹתִיּוֹת הַדְּבוּקוֹת אַחַר שֶׁכָּתַב לִפְנֵיהֶם שַׁפִּיר דָּמִי, דְּכֵיוָן שֶׁהָאוֹת צוּרָתָהּ עָלֶיהָ כְּשֶׁמַּפְרִידָהּ מֵחֲבֶרְתָּהּ לָא הָוֵי כְּכוֹתֵב, וְה "ה שֶׁאִם לֹא הָיוּ מִקְצָת יוֹדִי"ן שֶׁעַל הָאַלְ"פִין וְהַשִּׁינִי"ן וְהָעַינִי"ן וְרַגְלֵי הַתָּוִי"ן נוֹגְעִים בְּגוּף הָאוֹת וְתִינוֹק דְּלֹא חַכִּים וְלֹא טִפֵּשׁ מַכִּירָם, שֶׁאַף עַל פִּי שֶׁכָּתַב לִפְנֵיהֶם יָכוֹל לַחֲזֹר וּלְתַקְּנָם, דְּכֵיוָן דְּצוּרַת הָאוֹת הָיְתָה נִכֶּרֶת לֵיכָּא מִשּׁוּם כְּתָבָן שֶׁלֹּא כְּסִדְרָן. וְיֵשׁ מִי שֶׁאוֹמֵר דְּה "ה אִם חֻטְרָא דְּחֵי"ת לְמַעְלָה אֵין נוֹגְעִים זֶה לָזֶה, אַךְ אֵין נִכָּר לְהֶדְיָא פְּרֵידָתָן, אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁהַתִּינוֹק קוֹרֵא שְׁנֵי זַיְנִי"ן מֻתָּר לְהַדְבִּיקָם.
25 Any letter that's written in an improper way and it doesn't have its normal form, for example, the "foot" of an "א" touched the "roof" of the "א", or the inner "face" of the "א" [touched] the bottom "roof", or the "foot" of a "ה" or the "foot" of a "ק" touched, or if one letter was split into two letters, for example a "צ" that was written as "נ" "י", or a "ש" that was written as "ע" י", or a "ח" [that was written] as two "ז"s, and after he proceeded writing, he went back and fixed them, it is as if it was written out of order and it is invalid. But, to separate attached letters — after he proceeded writing — is acceptable, because since the letter had its normal form, when it's separated from its friend it's not as if it was written [right then]. And so too is the law that if the small "י" that's on an "א" and a "ש" and a "ע", and the "foot" of a "ת" was not touching the body of the letter, and a child who's neither a genius nor a simpleton recognizes [the letter], that even though he proceeded writing, he is able to go back and fix it because since the normal form of the letter was recognizable it's not considered written out of order. And there are those who say that so too is the law if the "branch" on the top of a "ח" it not touching this to that, but the separation is not clearly recognizable, that even though a child reads it as two "ז" it's permitted to attach them.