ח הָאַחִים שֶׁקָּנוּ אֶתְרוֹגִים מִתְּפִיסַת הַבַּיִת וְנָטַל אֶחָד מֵהֶם אֶתְרוֹג וְיָצָא בּוֹ, אִם יָכוֹל לְאָכְלוֹ וְאֵין הָאַחִים מַקְפִּידִים בְּכָךְ, יָצָא; וְאִם הָיוּ מַקְפִּידִים, לֹא יָצָא עַד שֶׁיִּתְּנוּ חֶלְקָם בַּמַּתָּנָה; וְאִם קָנָה זֶה אֶתְרוֹג וְזֶה פָּרִישׁ, אוֹ שֶׁקָּנוּ כְּאֶחָד אֶתְרוֹג, רִמּוֹן וּפָרִישׁ מִתְּפִיסַת הַבַּיִת, אֵינוֹ יוֹצֵא בָּאֶתְרוֹג עַד שֶׁיִּתְּנוּ לוֹ חֶלְקָם בְּמַתָּנָה, וְאַף עַל פִּי שֶׁאִם אֲכָלוֹ אֵין מַקְפִּידִים עָלָיו, מִפְּנֵי שֶׁכָּל שֶׁאֵין שָׁם מֵאוֹתוֹ הַמִּין אֵין מְחִילָתָם בִּסְתָם מוֹעֶלֶת, אֲבָל כְּשֶׁיֵּשׁ שָׁם מֵאוֹתוֹ הַמִּין אֲפִלּוּ הָיָה מְעֻלֶּה מֵאֲחֵרִים מְחִילָתָן בִּסְתָם מוֹעֶלֶת, לְפִי שֶׁאֵינָם מַקְפִּידִים.
8 If brothers buy etrogs from their joint inheritance and one takes the etrog, he fulfills the obligation if he could eat it and they wouldn't be angry. If they would be angry, he does not fulfill his obligation until they give their portions as a gift. If one bought an etrog and another bought a quince, or if they together bought an etrog, a pomegranate, and a quince from their inheritance, he cannot fulfill his obligation with the etrog until they give up their portions as a gift. Even were he to eat it, they would not be angry; because there is no other fruit of the same species, their presumed permission is not sufficient. However, if there is something else of the same species, even if one is better than the others, their presumed permission is sufficient because they will not be angry.