ח עַד הֵיכָן כִּבּוּד אָב וָאֵם, אֲפִלּוּ נָטְלוּ כִּיס שֶׁל זְהוּבִים שֶׁלּוֹ, וְהִשְׁלִיכוּ בְּפָנָיו לַיָּם, לֹא יַכְלִימֵם וְלא יְצַעֵר בִּפְנֵיהֶם וְלֹא יִכְעֹס כְּנֶגְדָּם, אֶלָּא יְקַבֵּל גְּזֵרַת הַכָּתוּב וְיִשְׁתֹּק. הַגָּה: וְיֵשׁ אוֹמְרִים דְּאִם רוֹצֶה לִזְרֹק מָעוֹת שֶׁל בֵּן לַיָּם דְּיָכוֹל לְמָנְעוֹ, דְּהָא אֵינוֹ חַיָּב לְכַבְּדוֹ רַק מִשֶּׁל אָב, אֲבָל לֹא מִשֶּׁל בֵּן (טוּר בְּשֵׁם ר"י). וְאֵין חִלּוּק בֵּין לְכַבְּדוֹ אוֹ לְצַעֲרוֹ (ת"ה סִימָן מ'). וְדַוְקָא קֹדֶם שֶׁזְּרָקָן, דְּאֶפְשָׁר דְמִמְנַע וְלֹא עָבֵיד, אֲבָל אִם כְּבָר זְרָקוּהוּ, אָסוּר לְאַכְלוּמֵהּ אֲבָל יוּכַל לְתָבְעוֹ לְדִינָא (טוּר בְּשֵׁם הָרֹא"שׁ). וְדַוְקָא אִם רוֹצֶה לִזְרֹק כִּיסוֹ לַיָּם, דְּאִית בֵּיהּ חֶסְרוֹן כִּיס, אֲבָל אִם רוֹצֶה לְהַעֲבִיר מִמֶּנּוּ רֶוַח בְּעָלְמָא, אָסוּר בְּכָל עִנְיָן (ר"ן פ"ק דְּקִדּוּשִׁין). בֵּן שֶׁיֵּשׁ לוֹ דִּין עִם אָבִיו, וְהָאָב הוּא תּוֹבֵעַ הַבֵּן, צָרִיךְ הַבֵּן לֵילֵךְ אַחַר אָבִיו אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁהַבֵּן הוּא נִתְבָּע וְדָר בְּעִיר אַחֶרֶת, שֶׁזֶּהוּ כְּבוֹד אָבִיו. אֲבָל הָאָב חַיָּב לְשַׁלֵּם לַבֵּן הוֹצָאוֹת, דְּאֵינוֹ חַיָּב לְכַבְּדוֹ מִשֶּׁל בֵּן (במהרי"ק שֹׁרֶשׁ נ"ח), כְּמוֹ שֶׁנִּתְבָּאֵר.
8 Up to where (how extensive) is the honor of father and mother? Even if [the parents] took his purse full of gold coins and threw it to the sea in front of him, he should not embarrass them, nor be distressed before them nor get angry towards them; but he should rather accept the written decree and be silent. Rema: And some say that if he wants to throw the son's purse to the sea, he may prevent him. For behold, he is only obligated to honor him from [the resources] of the father, but not from [those] of the son (Tur in the name of the Ri). And there is no distinction between honoring him and causing him distress (Terumat HaDeshen, Section 40). And [that is] only before that they threw it; as it is possible that he will be prevented and not do [it]. But if they already threw it, it is forbidden to embarrass him; but he may make a claim against him in court (Tur in the name of the Rosh). And [this is] only when he wants to throw his purse to the sea, since there is financial loss. But if he just wants to take profits away from him, it is forbidden in any manner (Ran, Kiddushin, Chapter 1). [In the case of] a son that has a case with his father and the father is the claimant, the son must go [to] the father - even though the son is the defendant and he lives in another city. For this is the honor of his father. However the father is obligated to pay the expenses to the son, since the son is not obligated to honor him from the his [own] resources (In the Maharik, Root 58), as will be explained.